Stephanie D. Coleman vs. Emma Mitts: votes, sponsorships, and money

Stephanie D. Coleman (16th Ward) and Emma Mitts (37th Ward), side by side.

  • They voted the same way on 98.7% of the 76 divided roll calls both voted on, and split on 1
  • Co-sponsored 1 items (items with 10 or fewer sponsors)
  • Share 4 committees
  • Addressed each other 3 times in recorded meetings (2 in agreement, 0 in disagreement)
Stephanie D. Coleman vs. Emma Mitts
Money near a vote is not evidence that it influenced the vote. Permalink: chicagopolitics.org/network/stephanie-d-coleman-vs-emma-mitts

Download: PNG · SVG · CSV

Embed this chart
<iframe src="https://www.chicagopolitics.org/network/stephanie-d-coleman-vs-emma-mitts/embed" title="Stephanie D. Coleman vs. Emma Mitts" width="760" height="404" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Campaign money

Stephanie D. ColemanEmma Mitts
Cash on hand$251,324$58,459
Raised this term$512,582$210,635
From registered lobbyists$70,251$73,500

Top donors to both

DonorStephanie D. ColemanEmma Mitts
Cari B Sacks$6,900$19,800
Michael J Sacks$6,900$19,800
INCS Action PAC$5,500$6,500

Where they split

DateLegislationStephanie D. ColemanEmma MittsMoney near the vote
May 7, 2025Amendment of Municipal Code Chapter 2-44 by adding new Section 2-44-170 establishing…NoYes-

Money near a vote is not evidence that it influenced the vote. "Money near the vote" is money from interests tied to that legislation in the year before it.

See also closest allies and the Council network.