Illinois' hemp THC ban starts Thursday. Chicago's own ban passed 32 to 16 and was vetoed. Here's how they fit
The state ban takes effect Nov. 12 for most sellers; about 250 businesses that sued get a pause until a Nov. 19 court hearing. The Council's January ban never took effect.
Most stores in Chicago that sell hemp-derived THC drinks, edibles and similar products have to stop on Thursday, when a new state law takes effect. Products with more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container will be treated as cannabis, sold only by licensed dispensaries, Block Club Chicago reported.
Why it matters: Chicago spent much of last winter fighting over its own ban. The Council passed one 32 to 16 in January; the Mayor vetoed it and the Council couldn't override him. The state is now doing what the City didn't.
What happens Thursday
- Who must stop: businesses not part of a federal lawsuit against the state must stop selling and making hemp THC products above the limit by Thursday or risk fines and enforcement, the Sun-Times reported.
- Who gets a pause: the Illinois Healthy Alternatives Association and five hemp businesses sued Nov. 5, arguing the law violates the Commerce Clause. The state agreed not to enforce it against them through Nov. 19. The association says it represents about 250 companies, Block Club reported.
- Nov. 19: U.S. District Judge Martha Pacold hears arguments on the plaintiffs' request to block the law, the Sun-Times reported.
- The federal timeline: Illinois' law follows federal rules from a 2025 spending bill. The federal deadline was recently pushed to Dec. 11, but Illinois kept its November date, the Sun-Times reported. Gov. JB Pritzker signed the state law in June.
What the Council did
Ald. Marty Quinn (13th) introduced a citywide ban in November 2025 (SO2025-0021018). Before the final vote, it was rewritten to exempt THC drinks, CBD topicals and products for animals, Block Club reported at the time. The exemption let businesses with liquor licenses keep selling THC beverages. The Council passed it Jan. 21, 32 to 16, WTTW reported.
How each ward voted
32 yea, 16 nay, 2 not voting · Jan 21, 2026 · Passed
1Daniel La Spata: Nay
2Brian Hopkins: Yea
3Pat Dowell: Nay
4Lamont J. Robinson: Nay
5Desmon C. Yancy: Nay
6William E. Hall: Not voting
7Gregory I. Mitchell: Yea
8Michelle A. Harris: Yea
9Anthony Beale: Yea
10Peter Chico: Yea
11Nicole T. Lee: Yea
12Julia M. Ramirez: Nay
13Marty Quinn: Yea
14Jeylú B. Gutiérrez: Yea
15Raymond A. Lopez: Yea
16Stephanie D. Coleman: Yea
17David H. Moore: Nay
18Derrick G. Curtis: Yea
19Matthew J. O'Shea: Yea
20Jeanette B. Taylor: Nay
21Ronnie L. Mosley: Yea
22Michael D. Rodriguez: Nay
23Silvana Tabares: Yea
24Monique L. Scott: Yea
25Byron Sigcho-López: Nay
26Jessica L. Fuentes: Nay
27Walter R. Burnett: Yea
28Jason C. Ervin: Yea
29Chris Taliaferro: Nay
30Ruth Cruz: Yea
31Felix Cardona Jr.: Yea
32Scott Waguespack: Yea
33Rossana Rodríguez Sánchez: Nay
34William Conway: Not voting
35Anthony J. Quezada: Nay
36Gilbert Villegas: Yea
37Emma Mitts: Yea
38Nicholas Sposato: Yea
39Samantha Nugent: Yea
40Andre Vasquez Jr.: Yea
41Anthony V. Napolitano: Yea
42Brendan Reilly: Yea
43Timothy R. Knudsen: Yea
44Bennett R. Lawson: Yea
45James M. Gardiner: Yea
46Angela Clay: Nay
47Matthew J. Martin: Yea
48Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: Nay
49Maria E. Hadden: Nay
50Debra L. Silverstein: YeaSO2025-0021018: the roll call, the timeline and the documents
Johnson vetoed it. He called it premature with a federal ban coming, and said he was vetoing it "as it is written," FOX 32 reported. On Feb. 18 an override attempt failed. Ald. Anthony Beale (9th) said the ordinance was "passed to protect children," and Ald. Andre Vasquez (40th) said the issue was "less about reefer madness and more about a government being able to properly regulate something," ABC7 reported. The override got 26 votes to 20, short of two-thirds, according to a trade publication's account.
Advertisement
What our records add
The co-sponsors. Quinn's ban had 13 co-sponsors: Napolitano (41st), Gardiner (45th), O'Shea (19th), Reilly (42nd), Tabares (23rd), Hopkins (2nd), Hall (6th), Manaa-Hoppenworth (48th), Harris (8th), Gutiérrez (14th), Mitts (37th), Villegas (36th) and Mosley (21st). Two of them broke from it on the final roll call: Manaa-Hoppenworth voted no, and Hall is recorded as not voting.
Smaller bans already passed. Before the citywide fight, the Council passed bans on hemp product sales in specific areas, including the O'Hare residential area (O2025-0017556), the Belmont Cragin-Hermosa area (O2025-0016755) and the Lake Calumet area (SO2025-0014904), all in 2025.
What the state law doesn't change. City licensing, zoning and the ward-level bans stay as they are. The state rule covers what can be sold outside dispensaries anywhere in Illinois.
What to watch
The Nov. 19 hearing decides whether the 250 or so businesses in the lawsuit can keep selling. If the judge blocks the law more broadly, the Council could see Quinn's issue again.