On My Block · Chicago Politics

Illinois' hemp THC ban starts Thursday. Chicago's own ban passed 32 to 16 and was vetoed. Here's how they fit

The state ban takes effect Nov. 12 for most sellers; about 250 businesses that sued get a pause until a Nov. 19 court hearing. The Council's January ban never took effect.

Most stores in Chicago that sell hemp-derived THC drinks, edibles and similar products have to stop on Thursday, when a new state law takes effect. Products with more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container will be treated as cannabis, sold only by licensed dispensaries, Block Club Chicago reported.

Why it matters: Chicago spent much of last winter fighting over its own ban. The Council passed one 32 to 16 in January; the Mayor vetoed it and the Council couldn't override him. The state is now doing what the City didn't.

What happens Thursday

  • Who must stop: businesses not part of a federal lawsuit against the state must stop selling and making hemp THC products above the limit by Thursday or risk fines and enforcement, the Sun-Times reported.
  • Who gets a pause: the Illinois Healthy Alternatives Association and five hemp businesses sued Nov. 5, arguing the law violates the Commerce Clause. The state agreed not to enforce it against them through Nov. 19. The association says it represents about 250 companies, Block Club reported.
  • Nov. 19: U.S. District Judge Martha Pacold hears arguments on the plaintiffs' request to block the law, the Sun-Times reported.
  • The federal timeline: Illinois' law follows federal rules from a 2025 spending bill. The federal deadline was recently pushed to Dec. 11, but Illinois kept its November date, the Sun-Times reported. Gov. JB Pritzker signed the state law in June.

What the Council did

Ald. Marty Quinn (13th) introduced a citywide ban in November 2025 (SO2025-0021018). Before the final vote, it was rewritten to exempt THC drinks, CBD topicals and products for animals, Block Club reported at the time. The exemption let businesses with liquor licenses keep selling THC beverages. The Council passed it Jan. 21, 32 to 16, WTTW reported.

How each ward voted

32 yea, 16 nay, 2 not voting · Jan 21, 2026 · Passed

Ward 1: Daniel La Spata: NayWard 2: Brian Hopkins: YeaWard 3: Pat Dowell: NayWard 4: Lamont J. Robinson: NayWard 5: Desmon C. Yancy: NayWard 6: William E. Hall: Not votingWard 7: Gregory I. Mitchell: YeaWard 8: Michelle A. Harris: YeaWard 9: Anthony Beale: YeaWard 10: Peter Chico: YeaWard 11: Nicole T. Lee: YeaWard 12: Julia M. Ramirez: NayWard 13: Marty Quinn: YeaWard 14: Jeylú B. Gutiérrez: YeaWard 15: Raymond A. Lopez: YeaWard 16: Stephanie D. Coleman: YeaWard 17: David H. Moore: NayWard 18: Derrick G. Curtis: YeaWard 19: Matthew J. O'Shea: YeaWard 20: Jeanette B. Taylor: NayWard 21: Ronnie L. Mosley: YeaWard 22: Michael D. Rodriguez: NayWard 23: Silvana Tabares: YeaWard 24: Monique L. Scott: YeaWard 25: Byron Sigcho-López: NayWard 26: Jessica L. Fuentes: NayWard 27: Walter R. Burnett: YeaWard 28: Jason C. Ervin: YeaWard 29: Chris Taliaferro: NayWard 30: Ruth Cruz: YeaWard 31: Felix Cardona Jr.: YeaWard 32: Scott Waguespack: YeaWard 33: Rossana Rodríguez Sánchez: NayWard 34: William Conway: Not votingWard 35: Anthony J. Quezada: NayWard 36: Gilbert Villegas: YeaWard 37: Emma Mitts: YeaWard 38: Nicholas Sposato: YeaWard 39: Samantha Nugent: YeaWard 40: Andre Vasquez Jr.: YeaWard 41: Anthony V. Napolitano: YeaWard 42: Brendan Reilly: YeaWard 43: Timothy R. Knudsen: YeaWard 44: Bennett R. Lawson: YeaWard 45: James M. Gardiner: YeaWard 46: Angela Clay: NayWard 47: Matthew J. Martin: YeaWard 48: Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: NayWard 49: Maria E. Hadden: NayWard 50: Debra L. Silverstein: Yea
Yea Nay Not voting

Johnson vetoed it. He called it premature with a federal ban coming, and said he was vetoing it "as it is written," FOX 32 reported. On Feb. 18 an override attempt failed. Ald. Anthony Beale (9th) said the ordinance was "passed to protect children," and Ald. Andre Vasquez (40th) said the issue was "less about reefer madness and more about a government being able to properly regulate something," ABC7 reported. The override got 26 votes to 20, short of two-thirds, according to a trade publication's account.

What our records add

The co-sponsors. Quinn's ban had 13 co-sponsors: Napolitano (41st), Gardiner (45th), O'Shea (19th), Reilly (42nd), Tabares (23rd), Hopkins (2nd), Hall (6th), Manaa-Hoppenworth (48th), Harris (8th), Gutiérrez (14th), Mitts (37th), Villegas (36th) and Mosley (21st). Two of them broke from it on the final roll call: Manaa-Hoppenworth voted no, and Hall is recorded as not voting.

Smaller bans already passed. Before the citywide fight, the Council passed bans on hemp product sales in specific areas, including the O'Hare residential area (O2025-0017556), the Belmont Cragin-Hermosa area (O2025-0016755) and the Lake Calumet area (SO2025-0014904), all in 2025.

What the state law doesn't change. City licensing, zoning and the ward-level bans stay as they are. The state rule covers what can be sold outside dispensaries anywhere in Illinois.

What to watch

The Nov. 19 hearing decides whether the 250 or so businesses in the lawsuit can keep selling. If the judge blocks the law more broadly, the Council could see Quinn's issue again.