Armour SquareBridgeportChinatown
City Council opposes Amtrak's Canal Street rail yard plan near Bridgeport and Chinatown
A 49-0 resolution from Ald. Nicole Lee asks Amtrak to pause its federally funded maintenance yard until its environmental studies are public.

The Chicago City Council has gone on record against Amtrak's plan to build a train maintenance facility in the Canal Street Yard, the elevated rail yard that runs past Chinatown, Armour Square and Bridgeport. On Oct. 14 the Council adopted a resolution, R2026-0028877, by a vote of 49 to 0. Ald. Monique L. Scott (24th Ward) did not vote.
The resolution, filed by Ald. Nicole T. Lee (11th Ward) with 34 co-sponsors, opposes the facility in its current form and location. It calls on Amtrak to pause the project until a federal environmental determination and its supporting studies are public.
The stakes are spelled out in the resolution. It counts an estimated 6,741 residents within 500 feet of the proposed yard, including more than 1,000 children and more than 1,500 people over 65. About 29 residents live that close to Amtrak's current yard at 14th Street.
The resolution itself does not stop the project. Amtrak told the Council's transportation committee that the Federal Railroad Administration, not the City, makes the environmental decision, and that agency issued it in May. What the Council can do is press for documents, and that fight is now on the record.
"It is a needed and important improvement, but this is not simply a relocation of rail maintenance operations. It appears to be enabling the first step of a much larger private real estate transaction, financed substantially by federal taxpayer dollars."
Amtrak's team said the project would bring its trains into a state of good repair, with about 3,000 construction jobs and about 400 jobs once it opens.
What would Amtrak build, and where?
According to Amtrak's presentation to the committee on Oct. 7, the yard runs between Canal and Stewart from just north of Cermak Road to Pershing Road. Train storage and a car wash would sit between 26th and 29th streets. The main building, a train shed, would run from 33rd to 35th Street.
The resolution puts federal support at up to $572 million for the facility and up to $87 million for bridge and viaduct repairs. Amtrak confirmed those two grants when Ald. Michelle A. Harris (8th Ward) asked.
Lee described a building large enough to service nine trains at once, four stories tall and running around the clock. She said a Chicago public school sits 586 feet from it and Armour Square Park 413 feet away.
The resolution lists Armour Square Park, Armour Square Senior Homes, T.E. Brown Senior Apartments and Wentworth Gardens Homes nearby. It names Robert Healy Elementary, Minnie Miñoso Academy, Air Force Academy High School, Armour Elementary, Bridgeport Catholic Academy and De La Salle Institute among area schools.
Amtrak said its 14th Street yard is aging and too cramped to service a whole train in one building. Rebuilding it in place, it said, would disrupt service for years. It said trains would move through the yard at 5 to 10 miles per hour, with engines off overnight, and that the project adds no trains.
Its noise study found moderate impacts at four spots along the tracks and none elsewhere, the presenters said, and no vibration impacts. They said the nearest homes are about 120 feet from the new building.
What supporters and opponents said
The sharpest complaints were about documents. The federal agency approved the project under a categorical exclusion, which Lee said means no independent environmental impact study is required.
Amtrak has said it will publish its studies. Lee said the community is still waiting.
Ald. Brian Hopkins (2nd Ward) asked the chair to formally request the technical analysis and field data behind all 12 areas the environmental review covered.
"And it's highly unusual to have a subject matter hearing where the documents related to that subject have not been provided to us."
Ald. Pat Dowell (3rd Ward), whose ward includes blocks south of 35th Street near the planned train shed, said no one from the project contacted her office between 2023 and 2026. She said three of the four noise locations rated moderate are south of 35th Street, near Wentworth Gardens and T.E. Brown Apartments.
"And so in three years, there was not a letter, email, phone call to anybody that would be impacted by this development."
Ald. Andre Vasquez Jr. (40th Ward) asked Amtrak to show the committee its record of conversations with Lee's office, and Amtrak agreed. Ald. David H. Moore (17th Ward) said he could not see the project as positive for the community.
Lee also tied the plan to the White Sox, saying it is part of a plan to move the team out of the 11th Ward. Amtrak said its federal application does not mention a White Sox stadium. Its development partner, Canal Edge, called the yard a separate project from any decision about the team.
Public comment split. Residents and community groups spoke against the location. Labor and building trades speakers backed the project for its construction and rail jobs.
What happens next?
The committee recommended the resolution by voice vote on Oct. 7, and the full Council adopted it a week later. Copies go to Amtrak, the Federal Railroad Administration, federal and state environmental regulators, the governor and attorney general, the Cook County Board president and Illinois' members of Congress.
Amtrak offered to return and walk the committee through its environmental studies once they are published. Lee said she has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the federal agency. She asked Amtrak to commit to no construction until an environmental impact study is shared with the community.
The Council's next regular meetings are set for Dec. 8 and 9. Residents can reach the 11th Ward office, or sign up for public comment at a Council or committee meeting.
"I think it's clear that this project isn't ready for prime time"
How each ward voted
49 yea, 1 not voting · Oct 14, 2026 · Adopted
1Daniel La Spata: Yea
2Brian Hopkins: Yea
3Pat Dowell: Yea
4Lamont J. Robinson: Yea
5Desmon C. Yancy: Yea
6William E. Hall: Yea
7Gregory I. Mitchell: Yea
8Michelle A. Harris: Yea
9Anthony Beale: Yea
10Peter Chico: Yea
11Nicole T. Lee: Yea
12Julia M. Ramirez: Yea
13Marty Quinn: Yea
14Jeylú B. Gutiérrez: Yea
15Raymond A. Lopez: Yea
16Stephanie D. Coleman: Yea
17David H. Moore: Yea
18Derrick G. Curtis: Yea
19Matthew J. O'Shea: Yea
20Jeanette B. Taylor: Yea
21Ronnie L. Mosley: Yea
22Michael D. Rodriguez: Yea
23Silvana Tabares: Yea
24Monique L. Scott: Not voting
25Byron Sigcho-López: Yea
26Jessica L. Fuentes: Yea
27Walter R. Burnett: Yea
28Jason C. Ervin: Yea
29Chris Taliaferro: Yea
30Ruth Cruz: Yea
31Felix Cardona Jr.: Yea
32Scott Waguespack: Yea
33Rossana Rodríguez Sánchez: Yea
34William Conway: Yea
35Anthony J. Quezada: Yea
36Gilbert Villegas: Yea
37Emma Mitts: Yea
38Nicholas Sposato: Yea
39Samantha Nugent: Yea
40Andre Vasquez Jr.: Yea
41Anthony V. Napolitano: Yea
42Brendan Reilly: Yea
43Timothy R. Knudsen: Yea
44Bennett R. Lawson: Yea
45James M. Gardiner: Yea
46Angela Clay: Yea
47Matthew J. Martin: Yea
48Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: Yea
49Maria E. Hadden: Yea
50Debra L. Silverstein: YeaR2026-0028877: the roll call, the timeline and the documents