Committee on Budget and Government Operations meeting, October 29, 2025

When: Wed, Oct 29, 2025, 12:00 PM (Chicago time)
Where: City Council Chamber, 2nd Floor, City Hall, 121 North LaSalle Street - Chicago, IL 60602
Status: Scheduled & Published
Committee: Committee on Budget and Government Operations
Video: https://vimeo.com/showcase/8925576?video=1130036956
Transcript: full text (47,934 words, automatic captions)

Video chapters

21:36 Public comment
38:23 Jason C. Ervin: Asked a Procurement Services employee during public comment whether he is covered by a…
43:18 FY2026 budget hearing: Office of Inspector General
52:46 Matthew J. Martin: Commended the Inspector General and asked her to highlight budget-related efficiency and…
57:29 Matthew J. Martin: Asked about OIG's performance metrics and whether the proposed budget would fund a…
1:00:14 Matthew J. Martin: Asked how a more modest approach of posting FOIA-released misconduct records would fit…
1:01:14 Brendan Reilly: Thanked the Inspector General and asked what legislative reform remains undone that the…
1:04:46 Brendan Reilly: Asked whether OIG must get the budget director's permission to structure its budget…
1:06:27 Jason C. Ervin: Asked why payments are made directly to OIG and whether its confidential funds are audited…
1:12:45 Jason C. Ervin: Said that if confidential spending is never reviewed no one can know whether it matches its…
1:14:27 Brendan Reilly: Said he has full faith in how the Inspector General uses confidential funds given the…
1:21:54 Bennett R. Lawson: Asked why a year passed between an incident and the start of the investigation involving…
1:23:42 Bennett R. Lawson: Asked how many investigators OIG has in the proposed budget.
1:23:56 Bennett R. Lawson: Asked whether a search for a new Inspector General has begun and who would serve as…
1:33:12 James M. Gardiner: Asked the chair how much money was in the OIG confidential account discussed earlier.
1:34:14 James M. Gardiner: Asked the Inspector General why she is not seeking a second term.
1:35:44 James M. Gardiner: Cited an OIG-recommended firing of a ward superintendent and an investigation he said…
1:41:38 Raymond A. Lopez: Asked whether elected officials, including council members, may decline OIG findings…
1:43:24 Raymond A. Lopez: Asked whether the code should be amended so substantiated violations automatically result…
1:47:22 Raymond A. Lopez: Noted that felony convictions remove officials from office and asked whether automatic…
1:53:29 Maria E. Hadden: Said she appreciated Alderperson Raymond A. Lopez questions and that questions of…
1:54:24 Maria E. Hadden: Said there had been attempts to bully the Inspector General, including that day, and that…
1:56:21 Maria E. Hadden: Offered apologies to anyone at OIG who has been thwarted by the council or the mayor's…
1:57:51 David H. Moore: Asked the Inspector General whether anyone in her office shares the vision and work ethic of…
2:00:16 David H. Moore: Asked whether staffing analyses also address management positions when reductions are made.
2:02:49 David H. Moore: Asked whether COFA incorporates the Inspector General's budget-related recommendations in…
3:22:10 FY2026 budget hearing: Department of Procurement Services
3:31:28 Emma Mitts: Acknowledged DPS cost savings and outreach and asked what additional strategies will build on…
3:33:06 Emma Mitts: Asked what DPS learned from its vendor focus groups.
3:36:16 Emma Mitts: Asked how the new dashboard and outreach events will help offices connect small businesses with…
3:43:53 Pat Dowell: Asked whether MBE/WBE numbers improved over last year, including for African American firms in…
3:46:07 Pat Dowell: Asked the Chief Procurement Officer's view on centralizing procurement functions within DPS.
3:47:18 Pat Dowell: Asked how many departments have independent procurement authority, what resources DPS would…
3:53:51 Samantha Nugent: Asked whether 49% of spending is outside DPS because of missing contract vehicles and…
3:56:18 Samantha Nugent: Said DPS could leverage the city's purchasing power with master contracts even for…
4:00:09 Nicole T. Lee: Asked whether there is a single software system for city payments and noted aldermanic…
4:02:14 Nicole T. Lee: Described the federal interim final rule removing race and gender from the DBE program and…
4:05:51 Nicole T. Lee: Asked how alderpersons can help spread word about DBE recertification workshops.
4:11:13 Gilbert Villegas: Asked which procurement categories DPS should handle versus other departments.
4:13:58 Gilbert Villegas: Suggested legislation requiring departments to report to DPS as a central clearinghouse…
4:15:30 Gilbert Villegas: Noted that workforce compliance for other departments is not reported through DPS, so only…
4:47:05 William Conway: Asked whether DPS received Ernst & Young's backup data for the report's estimate of $55…
4:49:18 William Conway: Asked whether the Chief Procurement Officer believes those savings are achievable.
4:49:43 William Conway: Said he believes most members would support giving DPS more power to centralize purchasing.
4:50:46 Jeanette B. Taylor: Asked how businesses sign up to do business with the city and how long the process takes.
4:53:07 Jeanette B. Taylor: Asked how vendors who cannot perform are held accountable.
4:55:08 Jeanette B. Taylor: Said some sites listed as minority-owned have no Black workers and asked what the…
5:02:46 Samantha Nugent: Asked how many competitively bid contracts the city has entered since the Chief Procurement…
5:24:34 Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: Asked how DPS is using AI technology in modernizing procurement.
5:25:39 Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: Asked how DPS will ensure AI is used equitably given it relies on historical vendor…
5:26:59 Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth: Asked for assurance that AI will collect data rather than make final decisions, and…
5:28:03 Stephanie D. Coleman: Described problems with a weed-cutting vendor lacking capacity to cover the many…
5:29:33 Stephanie D. Coleman: Proposed a pilot program, possibly through legislation, for wards 16, 24 and 20,…
5:53:08 FY2026 budget hearing: Department of Environment
6:14:11 Julia M. Ramirez: Asked the commissioner to explain the importance of the cumulative impacts assessment and…
6:18:08 Julia M. Ramirez: Asked about green stormwater infrastructure investment on the Southwest Side after summer…
6:21:00 Julia M. Ramirez: Asked how ward offices can better partner with the department to serve residents.
6:23:16 Byron Sigcho-López: Commended the creation of a fully fledged Department of Environment and criticized the…
6:24:20 Byron Sigcho-López: Asked how the cumulative impacts ordinance would complement inspections and green…
6:28:51 Byron Sigcho-López: Raised concern about large developments in industrial areas proceeding by right and…

Meeting notes

AI-written from the transcript. Speakers are inferred from cues in the recording, so treat names as estimates and check the video at the linked time.

The Committee on Budget and Government Operations continued its FY2026 budget hearings with public comment followed by hearings on the Office of Inspector General, the Department of Procurement Services, and the Department of Environment. Members questioned the outgoing Inspector General about OIG's budget floor, spending independence, oversight of confidential funds, investigative timeliness, and what recourse exists when recommendations are declined. Procurement questioning centered on the roughly 49% of city spending procured outside the department, MBE/WBE participation data, federal changes to the DBE program, sole-source contracts, the ERP system, and the proposed elimination of five field analyst positions. Members asked the Department of Environment about its consolidation of environmental functions, grant funding, building benchmarking enforcement, cumulative impacts policy, and vacancies. No votes were taken; the hearings were for discussion and the committee recessed until October 30.

Topics: FY2026 budget hearings, Office of Inspector General, OIG independence and recommendations, Procurement centralization, MBE/WBE and DBE programs, Sole-source contracts, ERP modernization, Department of Environment consolidation, Building benchmarking, Cumulative impacts

Agenda items discussed

21:36 Public comment: discussed
43:18 FY2026 budget hearing: Office of Inspector General: discussed
3:22:10 FY2026 budget hearing: Department of Procurement Services: discussed
5:53:08 FY2026 budget hearing: Department of Environment: discussed

Alderpersons who spoke

Jason C. Ervin (chair): Asked a Procurement Services employee during public comment whether he is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. (38:23); Asked why payments are made directly to OIG and whether its confidential funds are audited or reviewed by anyone outside the office. (1:06:27); Said that if confidential spending is never reviewed no one can know whether it matches its purpose, and that someone such as external auditors should review it. (1:12:45)
Matthew J. Martin (alderperson): Commended the Inspector General and asked her to highlight budget-related efficiency and revenue items from a document OIG circulated. (52:46); Asked about OIG's performance metrics and whether the proposed budget would fund a broader police misconduct database. (57:29); Asked how a more modest approach of posting FOIA-released misconduct records would fit within the proposed budget. (1:00:14)
Brendan Reilly (alderperson): Thanked the Inspector General and asked what legislative reform remains undone that the council should consider. (1:01:14); Asked whether OIG must get the budget director's permission to structure its budget submission. (1:04:46); Said he has full faith in how the Inspector General uses confidential funds given the sensitive subject matter. (1:14:27)
Bennett R. Lawson (alderperson): Asked why a year passed between an incident and the start of the investigation involving a mayoral staffer and whether that was a budget or personnel issue. (1:21:54); Asked how many investigators OIG has in the proposed budget. (1:23:42); Asked whether a search for a new Inspector General has begun and who would serve as acting Inspector General. (1:23:56)
James M. Gardiner (alderperson): Asked the chair how much money was in the OIG confidential account discussed earlier. (1:33:12); Asked the Inspector General why she is not seeking a second term. (1:34:14); Cited an OIG-recommended firing of a ward superintendent and an investigation he said cost the city over $200,000 and failed in court, and said he might not take OIG recommendations seriously given that record. (1:35:44)
Raymond A. Lopez (alderperson): Asked whether elected officials, including council members, may decline OIG findings against their employees. (1:41:38); Asked whether the code should be amended so substantiated violations automatically result in action rather than being left to discretion. (1:43:24); Noted that felony convictions remove officials from office and asked whether automatic termination for violations of law is possible. (1:47:22)
Maria E. Hadden (alderperson): Said she appreciated Alderperson Raymond A. Lopez questions and that questions of enforcement and accountability are ongoing. (1:53:29); Said there had been attempts to bully the Inspector General, including that day, and that she has seen colleagues treat her differently than a man in the role. (1:54:24); Offered apologies to anyone at OIG who has been thwarted by the council or the mayor's office and said there should be no double standard. (1:56:21)
David H. Moore (alderperson): Asked the Inspector General whether anyone in her office shares the vision and work ethic of her and her predecessor. (1:57:51); Asked whether staffing analyses also address management positions when reductions are made. (2:00:16); Asked whether COFA incorporates the Inspector General's budget-related recommendations in advising the council. (2:02:49)
Emma Mitts (alderperson): Acknowledged DPS cost savings and outreach and asked what additional strategies will build on the $6.5 million saved. (3:31:28); Asked what DPS learned from its vendor focus groups. (3:33:06); Asked how the new dashboard and outreach events will help offices connect small businesses with contracting opportunities. (3:36:16)
Pat Dowell (alderperson): Asked whether MBE/WBE numbers improved over last year, including for African American firms in construction and professional services. (3:43:53); Asked the Chief Procurement Officer's view on centralizing procurement functions within DPS. (3:46:07); Asked how many departments have independent procurement authority, what resources DPS would need, and whether centralization could be achieved in 2026. (3:47:18)
Samantha Nugent (alderperson): Asked whether 49% of spending is outside DPS because of missing contract vehicles and whether departments buy the same items off different contracts at different prices. (3:53:51); Said DPS could leverage the city's purchasing power with master contracts even for departments with independent authority and asked for supporting data. (3:56:18); Asked how many competitively bid contracts the city has entered since the Chief Procurement Officer took office. (5:02:46)
Nicole T. Lee (alderperson): Asked whether there is a single software system for city payments and noted aldermanic offices' separate process. (4:00:09); Described the federal interim final rule removing race and gender from the DBE program and asked how existing DBEs are being reevaluated and informed. (4:02:14); Asked how alderpersons can help spread word about DBE recertification workshops. (4:05:51)
Gilbert Villegas (alderperson): Asked which procurement categories DPS should handle versus other departments. (4:11:13); Suggested legislation requiring departments to report to DPS as a central clearinghouse and asked what compliance DPS enforces. (4:13:58); Noted that workforce compliance for other departments is not reported through DPS, so only half the picture is visible. (4:15:30)
William Conway (alderperson): Asked whether DPS received Ernst & Young's backup data for the report's estimate of $55 million to $111 million in procurement savings. (4:47:05); Asked whether the Chief Procurement Officer believes those savings are achievable. (4:49:18); Said he believes most members would support giving DPS more power to centralize purchasing. (4:49:43)
Jeanette B. Taylor (alderperson): Asked how businesses sign up to do business with the city and how long the process takes. (4:50:46); Asked how vendors who cannot perform are held accountable. (4:53:07); Said some sites listed as minority-owned have no Black workers and asked what the process is to hold firms accountable. (4:55:08)
Leni Manaa-Hoppenworth (alderperson): Asked how DPS is using AI technology in modernizing procurement. (5:24:34); Asked how DPS will ensure AI is used equitably given it relies on historical vendor data. (5:25:39); Asked for assurance that AI will collect data rather than make final decisions, and whether jobs will be affected. (5:26:59)
Stephanie D. Coleman (alderperson): Described problems with a weed-cutting vendor lacking capacity to cover the many city-owned lots in her area. (5:28:03); Proposed a pilot program, possibly through legislation, for wards 16, 24 and 20, noting firearms found in overgrown lots. (5:29:33)
Julia M. Ramirez (alderperson): Asked the commissioner to explain the importance of the cumulative impacts assessment and pending policy for 2026. (6:14:11); Asked about green stormwater infrastructure investment on the Southwest Side after summer flooding. (6:18:08); Asked how ward offices can better partner with the department to serve residents. (6:21:00)
Byron Sigcho-López (alderperson): Commended the creation of a fully fledged Department of Environment and criticized the federal government's environmental policies. (6:23:16); Asked how the cumulative impacts ordinance would complement inspections and green infrastructure near schools in industrial corridors. (6:24:20); Raised concern about large developments in industrial areas proceeding by right and asked the department's role with council on permits. (6:28:51)

Exchanges between members

35:00 Reilly asked the chair to slow the clock for members' questioning, and the chair replied that the clock does not lie.
1:33:12 Gardiner asked the chair how much money was in the OIG account the chair had raised.
1:33:24 The chair said he did not know the amount and cited a figure from a report he had reviewed.
1:53:27 Hadden said she appreciated Lopez's line of questioning on enforcing OIG findings.
1:58:56 The chair asked Moore to move on from asking the Inspector General to name possible successors.
1:59:23 Moore said the Inspector General did not have to answer but he still wanted to hear her thoughts.
2:03:39 The chair told Moore his question for COFA would be addressed later.
2:04:00 Moore thanked the chair and explained he wanted to know whether COFA and OIG collaborate.
3:52:03 The chair followed up on Dowell's question about centralizing procurement.
3:57:36 After Nugent's point of information on the 49% of spending outside DPS, the chair said it was a good point and something needs to change.
4:10:40 The chair restated Lee's data request as contract utilization versus awards.
4:10:49 Lee thanked the chair for clarifying her request.
4:20:49 The chair asked Villegas to explain the acronyms he was using.
4:21:07 Villegas apologized to the chair and asked what ERP stood for.
4:21:37 The chair said Villegas's ERP question was appropriate and that he had planned to raise it as well.
4:41:43 Reilly said he was underscoring a point Nugent made about controlling spending through DPS.
5:28:03 Coleman built on Taylor's concerns about the weed-cutting contract.
5:29:42 Coleman suggested to the chair that a pilot program for wards 16, 24 and 20 may need legislation.
5:30:55 The chair elaborated on Coleman's request, suggesting separate contracts for high-volume areas.
5:38:58 The chair referenced Reilly's suggestion to centralize purchasing with sister agencies.

Documents

Sources and methods: how we get and count this data · report an error